Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

NATM failures: the facts


There have been 67 NATM collapses since 1973, research published by the Health & Safety Executive last year revealed.

The risk to third parties from bored tunnelling in soft ground lists three NATM failures on S ão Paulo Metro alone:

December 1981. Tunnel collapses during excavation in soft ground, leading to local instability. Buildings have to be demolished.

November 1991. Tunnel in soft ground collapses and oods.

November 1993. A sink hole opens up following a collapse in soft ground.

The report also highlights that:

0% of NATM tunnel incidents occur close to the face, before the structure is complete.

Over half of collapses result in a surface crater.

The primary cause of failures is unpredicted ground conditions.

The report emphasises 'the necessity for a good prior understanding of the ground and for thorough contingency and emergency pre-planning.

'It is also possible for ground conditions to change rapidly over short tunnel advances and this can result in sudden unstable open tunnel faces.' UK NATM expert and coauthor of the guidance, John Anderson, warned: 'You can get pockets of soft material, perched water, boulders - things that don't allow you any mistakes.

'You have to design your tunnelling system to maintain safety in all circumstances.

'The Heathrow Express tunnel was excavated in London Clay, which is very well understood and is generally a good, consistent material.

If you can get NATM wrong there you can get it wrong anywhere, ' he said.'You have to have a very exact knowledge of the kind of ground you are operating in.' The tunnel collapsed in October 1994 but was only fully explain in February 1999 (NCE 18 February 1999).

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.