Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

National Grid warns of low winter electricity capacity

National Grid has warned that its capacity to supply electricity this winter will be at a seven-year low.

It said this was due to generator closures and breakdowns.

However, both the electricity infrastructure operator and the Government insisted there was no danger of any blackouts in the event of unexpected scenarios, such as an extremely cold winter.

Energy minister Matthew Hancock said: “We are absolutely clear we are taking the measures necessary in order to have secure energy supplies this winter.”

Cordi O’Hara, National Grid’s director of market operations, said: “It’s clear the country has the ability to meet its energy needs in a cold winter. But we cannot be complacent and will be monitoring the situation right through to spring next year.

“The electricity margin has decreased compared to recent years, but the outlook remains manageable and well within the reliability standard set by government.”

Spare electricity capacity, which ran at about 5% over the winter months last year, would be nearer 4% this year, National Grid said. Three years ago the margin was 17%.

The network operator said it is finalising contracts with three UK power stations to provide reserve power in case of higher-than-expected demand.

In the event of disruption of Russian gas supplies to Europe, National Grid said more expensive gas could be imported. This would only happen in the “most extreme scenario”, it said.

Caroline Flint MP, Labour’s shadow energy and climate change secretary, said: “The security of our energy supply has not been helped by the fall in investment under this government. With a quarter of our power stations closing this decade it is vital that we bring forward investment in secure and clean energy for the future.”

Andrew Whalley, a member of the British Wind partnership and CEO of REG, a British renewable energy generator, said: “Energy minister Matthew Hancock, rightly wants the cheapest low carbon energy, but nuclear power isn’t the cheapest answer. Onshore wind is already cheaper than new nuclear power: by 2020 it could become the cheapest of all new power generation technologies. The onshore wind pipeline snarled up in the planning process is vital to ensuring secure UK electricity at the lowest cost.”

CECA chief executive Alasdair Reisner said: “The future energy landscape in the UK will be challenging in terms of guaranteeing supply and managing demand.

“We have repeatedly said that only a long-term energy strategy which has full industry and cross-party support will ensure the continuation of a safe and secure energy supply to complement our economic and social growth.

“To achieve this effectively delivering Electricity Market Reform combined with better management of energy demand is vital.

“We call on Government to complete the implementation of Electricity Market Reform to secure investment in all of the low carbon sectors – renewables, carbon capture and storage (CCS) and new nuclear - and put energy efficiency at the heart of a long-term energy strategy.

“At the same time there must be Levy Control Framework clarity over the next decade to deliver low carbon deployment and ensure best value.”

Readers' comments (3)

  • Industry must be given priority for power. If people cannot work productively they cannot earn enough to afford this expensive green power.
    We have already lost the jobs that go with energy intensive industries such as Aluminium.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I wonder what percentage of the installed wind capacity, indicated as 8,403 MW on the NETA website is included as available? A prudent allowance, based on previous performance, especially in cold high pressure conditions would be 2% of it ie. 400MW. Something tells me more than this has been included.

    Derek Limbert (F)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Correction, 170MW not 400MW apologies


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.