Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Multiple tenders waste of resources

Letters

Your article 'LAs hit by funding fatigue' (NCE 31 January) highlights the downside of competitive tendering. It is not only the time and resources required but also the wasted cost to tendering organisations.

At the rate quoted in your article, 146 proposals for 32 schemes, or four? proposals for every success, it must be wondered whether this is a cost effective use of public money.

If you add the competitive tendering required of consultants to develop the schemes and contractors that might build them, you could be talking of 15 proposals for each scheme. No wonder that the smaller firms, such as consultants, find that their margins cannot afford this waste.

Edward Hepper (F), Uplands, 61 Queens Road, Alton, Hants GU34 1JG

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.