Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

MP demands end to Olympic bid secrecy


LONDON'S OLYMPIC chiefs are under pressure to cut the secrecy surrounding the tendering process for work on the Olympic Park in Stratford and reveal the identities of shortlisted firms.

Labour MP for Sheffield Attercliffe Clive Betts this week tabled a Parliamentary Question demanding that culture secretary Tessa Jowell force the London Development Agency to reveal fi ms in the running for the £2.4bn project.

'I had previously raised the issue of a need for transparency in the public-private arrangements necessary to deliver the Games back in July, ' said Betts, a member of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister select committee.

he culture secretary assured me that the procurement pro ss would be transparent, so I'm amazed the LDA won't tell people which firms have been shortlisted, he added.' The LDA refused to reveal the identities of the six firms in the running for the programme management contract, but identifi d in NCE 27 October, and of consultants tendering for design contracts.

It has also refused to name those who were last week interviewed for the job of Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) chair man, and the candidates for the ODA chief executive, interviews for which take place this week.

An LDA spokesman said: 'We are not obliged and it is not common practice in government contracts to publish shortlists.

But we will take it case by case as to what we make public - there have been cases where we have published shortlists, such as the shortlist for the Aquatics centre.

'We are aware that there's an interest in the Olympics, but we need to follow best practice in procurement.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.