Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report: There is too much corruption in construction

A study carried out as part of a global effort to reduce construction industry corruption has criticised a lack of transparency in the UK’s public sector procurement process.

Globally, corruption in the construction industry has been estimated to cost society about £250bn per year. As well as the monetary cost, corruption and a lack of contract transparency frequently results in dangerous and defective infrastructure.

The UK pilot of the Construction Sector Transparency Initiative (CoST), managed by the ICE, reviewed information on projects from four public sector bodies - Broadland Housing Association, Durham County Council, the Highways Agency and the Environment Agency.


The study found that little information is disclosed to the public about what construction is procured, the purpose of that procurement, or the costs involved.

An overwhelming majority of respondents surveyed, almost 90%, felt that disclosure of this information would improve the transparency of publicly financed construction projects and ultimately help drive down costs.
International development secretary Andrew Mitchell said that corruption and mismanagement on construction projects in the developing world needed to be highlighted in particular.

“By encouraging transparency, CoST is playing a vital role in building a safer, more efficient construction sector in developing and developed countries,” he said.


Chairman of the group which led the UK pilot Bob McKittrick agreed, adding that there are a multitude of examples internationally where a lack of transparency and accountability has lead to disastrous consequences.

“The CoST project aims to ensure that governments and taxpayers receive value for the public projects which they commission, and that they “get what they pay for”.

CoST is an international partnership scheme supported by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) and the World Bank which has been piloted in seven countries: Ethiopia, Malawi, Philippines, Tanzania, the United Kingdom, Vietnam and Zambia.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.