Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Morgan on stations


Metronet's biggest weaknesses is in its station programme, where it blames scope changes for delays and cost overruns, but Morgan dismissed this.

'We just got on with it. We didn't wait for agreement over scope issues. Because it is not just money - it is time. So we said 'we'll do it and put it through dispute resolution'.

'We took that risk and we are now four years in. We haven't been late and in a very complex project we have one judgment going to court. And there we are talking £20M to £30M. If the judge finds against us, we pay.' 'We are nothing like £750M over, we are not even down that route.' This, Morgan added, is despite the projected costs of some stations soaring from £4M to £15M because of the vagaries of a contract that provides huge scope for disagreement, such as the definition of the work required.

'Station work is simply classed as either 'modernisation', 'enhanced refurbishment' or 'refurbishment'. But what is 'refurbishment?'' he explained.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.