Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

More in the mix


Martin Cooper asks that apart from nuclear energy ''what are the realistic options for future power supply for this country' (Letters last week).

Does he mean apart from installing tidal barrages across the Severn and Humber estuaries; recovering waste heat from power stations;

burning domestic refuse as fuel;

growing biomass (burnable) crops or oilseeds to make biodiesel, or sugar beet to make ethanol; encouraging the use of geothermal energy, groundheat-pump technology or solar panels for water heating;

or using heat and power technology or small-scale hydro-electric or wave power?

While recognising that none of these technologies by themselves will solve our looming energy crisis, a policy that puts its faith in wind power (the least reliable) and nuclear (the most dangerous) would be nothing short of barmy.

Roger Evans (F), evans.roger@virgin. net.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.