Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Mistake Ken

Letters

Opposition to the notion of road tolls or congestion charging will continue to grow unless the government and Ken Livingstone realise that much more investment in public transport is needed first.

In its recent study Motoring Towards 2050, the RAC Foundation concluded that in the future charging will be required, although it will only be acceptable if introduced alongside road improvements, better traffic management, fuel duty reductions and enhanced public transport.

Unless the aim is to keep congestion and hence charges down, through investment in roads and rail, the Foundation remains implacably opposed to charging.

This assessment concurs with Westminster Council's view that without major improvements in public transport, most importantly the Tube, any congestion charging scheme in London would be a disaster for the capital.

It is wrong to tax motorists off the road when there is no decent alternative.

Councillor Kit Malthouse, deputy leader, Majority Party, Westminster City Council

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.