Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Military versus civil engineering

I am a civil engineer. I belong to the ICE and pay subscriptions to that body so that I may pursue a career in and be advised on civil engineering.

The excellent New Civil Engineer and Civil Engineering Proceedings provide us with up to date information on civil engineering.

Why then does the latest issue of Proceedings contain a paper on a military engineering project, Camp Bastion, Afghanistan?

Written by a military engineer the paper describes a project designed and built by military engineers for purely military purposes.

This may seem to be a minor objection and a fine point, but surely the raison d’être of the Institution of Civil Engineers and indeed our profession is to be non-military.

I choose not to associate myself with military projects and have to object to my subscription fee being used to publicise them.

ANDREW WOOD, Keighley, West Yorkshire,

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.