Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Mega M25 scheme delayed

Plans for a £5bn widening of the M25 could be delayed after it emerged that financial close on the multi-billion PFI deal will not be reached until April at the earliest.

PFI bidding was due to close at the end of 2008, but the Connect Plus consortium of Balfour Beatty, Skanska, Atkins and Egis Projects revised the deadline late last year to early 2009. NCE now understands that close will not be reached until the next financial year at the earliest, with five of the 11 lending banks still to commit.

The Highways Agency confirmed that part-funding by the Treasury was one option under consideration to plug the cash shortfall, but as it stands the gap is still too large.

The delay has forced the Agency to extend M25 managing agent Sphere’s contract by four and a half months to September. "This will make sure operation and maintenance of the by a sudden handover (to the PFI contractor)," said an Agency spokesman. "The extension will allow sufficient time for the existing managing agent to plan and carry out maintenance work and ensure a proper handover."

Another Agency spokesperson said: "The M25 DBFO contract is not on hold. We remain confident of a successful outcome, and start of work on widening the M25 is still programmed for April 2009."

Connect Plus began advance works in December. One option being suggested by Campaign for Better Transport is to scale back the project, which splits into four separate widening packages and a longterm maintenance deal.

Sections 2 and 5 are already expected to be tackled with the cheaper hard shoulder running approach (NCE 24 April 2008), and it could be an option to consider the same approach for the two remaining sections.

Campaign for Better Transport executive director Stephen Joseph told NCE: "We think this is a great opportunity to re-look at the scheme and consider [more] hard shoulder running. "The scheme as it stands is very, very expensive and that money could go a long way to a more cost effective transport scheme such as high speed rail."

Shoulder Substitute?
The DBFO will widen within the existing land-take of four sections of the M25 from three lanes to four. The sections are:

  • Section 1: Junctions 16 to 23

  • Section 2: Junctions 5 to 7 ATM

  • Section 4: Junctions 27 to 30

  • Section 5: Junctions 23 to 27 ATM

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.