Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

MARR teeny

Letters

The reality of the Mansfield & Ashford Regeneration Route (MARR) is different to that stated in your article (Regional spotlight 14 April). MARR provides a bypass to Mansfi eld but its contribution to improved east-west transport links is limited.

The route stops many miles short of the A1 and the remainder of the A617 eastwards is on substantially unimproved county roads.

It also fails to link the A60 north-east to the A1, the A617 north-west has two major bottlenecks before the M1, and the new junction with the A38 is problematic.

Nor does MARR effectively serve regeneration sites.

It passes entirely through agricultural green belt, avoiding the brownfield sites. This new land is being promoted for speculative development while important local brownfied sites remain neglected and existing business parks are substantially vacant.

D Froggatt, 65 Main Avenue, Sheffield, S17 4FH

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.