Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Made to measure


Regarding Designs for life (NCE 27 May) - an interesting article. But can you compare a single discipline steady state operation to the highly complex multi-discipline environment of a construction site?

How can you compare an office based employee who may encounter a potentially life threatening situation once in 20 or 30 years with a construction operative who has to manage multiple potential encounters on a daily basis!

In my experience over the last five years almost the main subject being discussed by designers is health and safety and the CDM regulations. The National Audit Office statement that 'many designers lack knowledge of their responsibilities under CDM . . .

and some believe they do not have any duties' is not only inaccurate but offensive.

What position does the ICE have on this? I sincerely hope it will support the competence and professionalism of members by refuting such nonsense.

Anthony Black (M), 12 Bogwood Drive, Crossford KY12 8QA

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.