Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Lyon's share


Adrian Lyons, director general of the Railway Forum, says we need 'civil engineers to come up and find ways of building this thing (Crossrail) more cheaply' (NCE last week).

Possibly. But the Crossrail team has some pretty experienced engineers, and it seems unlikely that big savings are left to be found.

Contractors may find clever ways to build it, but experience shows that costs are more likely to go up rather than down during implementation. What is required - if the scheme is to attract credible funding - is to cut out the elements of the scheme that are not worthwhile.

According to data Superlink obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, Whitechapel Station, at £320M, and the entire Shenfield Branch, at £1.5bn, are not worth building.

They increase the funding gap by about £1bn, and squander capacity of the expensive cross-London tunnel that could be more usefully used for additional trains to the growth areas and Stansted.

Construction will needlessly disrupt communities while actually lengthening rail journeys for thousands of passengers. It is planners, not engineers, who need to work smarter to make the scheme fundable.


org. uk Superlink Ltd, 1 Fleet Place, London EC4M 7NR

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.