Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Low down on New Orleans

Letters

The devastation of New Orleans was a disaster waiting to happen.

The city is artificial and depends on man made embankments to maintain river and lake levels above the city, along with continuous pumped drainage to dispose of sewage and storm water.

This is not risk free as it depends on constant maintenance, the cost of which will continue to rise as older sections need reconstruction. There is also the risk that essential works might be deferred for budgetry reasons.

A prudent policy would have been to put a stop to development in the low areas and gradually abandon such projects - or at least change their use to activities that can easily recover from flooding.

New development of the city would then have only been permitted in areas above the river level.

Similar catastrophes have happened in the past in Holland and at Canvey Island in the UK. In this case, the hurricane was the initiator, but sustained, heavy rainfall elsewhere in the catchment area could have a similar result.

Chris O'Hanlon, chris.ohanlon1@kolumbus. fi, Hakunintie 31, 12100 Oitti, Finland

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.