Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Long arm of the lore

Letters

Your correspondent Nick Chapman (NCE 13 June) does not seem to have heard of a well known public body called the police force.

They turn up to accidents much quicker than the Health & Safety Executive (HSE). I don't think the HSE would investigate the case of an unsupervised five year old child, who rode their bike off the footway into a passing car.

I support cycling and carry out audits to see how provision for cyclists can be integrated into new highway schemes.

But contrary to the cyclist's battle cry, motorcyclists, the disabled and pedestrians are the most vulnerable highway users. Take out people under 18 and cycling accidents involving injury become statistically insignificant.

To accommodate cyclists, often the only options involve expensive land purchase or narrowing of existing footways and carriageway lanes. I am sure that wheelchair users and mothers with prams would be justifiably put out by 1.2m footways so that ten cyclists a day could cycle in the perceived comfort of their own strip of highway.

John Edwards, local authority senior engineer, johned@madasafish. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.