Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Let's pull together behind SARTOR

Letters

Public perception of engineering as a career suitable for the 'less academic' (Letters, NCE 18 March) is an inevitable consequence of the low A Level entry requirements of many engineering degree courses. This is particularly true in civil engineering, and is one of the issues SARTOR is intended to address.

The SARTOR proposals been have publicised and debated extensively in NCE and elsewhere over the last few years and it is incredible that any member of the ICE has only recently become aware of them. The implementation of SARTOR is likely to result in major changes in many university civil engineering departments, yet most academics have come to accept SARTOR in the wider interests of the profession. The comment that training and registration of engineers has been hijacked by academics is unfounded and unfair. Rather than trying to reopen the debate, we should all put our energy into making SARTOR work.

William Powrie (F), 71 Station Road, Netley Abbey, Southampton, Hampshire SO31 5AE

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.