Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Leadership confusion holds back Thames Gateway


LACK OF leadership is undermining efforts to regenerate the Thames Gateway, according to a report to be published today by management consultant Hornagold & Hills.

Engineers and local government officials also said that too many organisations were involved in the programme, causing red tape and confusion about who was in charge.

These are the conclusions of a survey of 92 construction fi ms, local authorities and public sector bodies.

They were asked to name the barriers to the successful regeneration of 202,000ha of land lining the north and south banks of the Thames.

Respondents criticised the number of organisations involved in the project, describing it as 'rudderless' and a 'bureaucratic nightmare'.

They named 16 separate people or organisations as being in charge of the Thames Gateway Initiative, although most people cited deputy prime minister John Prescott as the man pushing the project forward. Eighty seven per cent said the leadership of the project was ineffective.

The sustainability of the project was also attacked.

Few thought it would benefit those already living in the area and several expressed concern that it would turn out like Docklands, where 60,000 people work but only 4,000 live locally.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.