Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

UK urged to work with US and Canada on SMR development

3154855 modular nuclear reactor

Nuclear developers have called on the UK to collaborate with the US and Canada to ensure they are at the forefront of small modular reactor technology. 

Developers have urged the government and industry to start “speaking the same language” as their US and Canada counterparts so they can capitalise on small modular reactor technology (SMR). 

Energy consultant Fire Energy director Fiona Reilly said that when it comes to SMR technology, the Western powers are all talking about different things. “When it comes to small reactors, the three countries [the US, Canada and the UK] have a problem, we are all speaking different languages, we are talking about the same things but in different terms.”  

In the US, small reactors are defined as any reactor with a 300MW capacity or below, whereas the UK defines an SMR as being up to 600MW.  

“If we can’t even agree on the definitions, we won’t agree on regulatory collaboration or financial collaboration,” Reilly said speaking at the Nuclear New Build conference in London. 

“We all know that Russia and China are powering ahead with their own developments but for us this is about collaboration and how we get ahead. If we compete against each other, someone will lose and we won’t bring forward the best possible technology to a market that is there for the taking, and industry needs to come forward and support this.”  

Reactor developer Moltex chief executive officer Stephen Haighton added the company had moved its first-of-a-kind SMR from the UK to Canada. “[Moltex] are in Canada now because it couldn’t make any head way in the UK,” he said.  

“[Moltex] had a completely different reaction to the technology in Canda compared to the UK and saw completely different attitudes to the future of nuclear technology. Moltex’s first-of-a-kind SMR is likely to be in Canada with the UK as an export market instead.”   

Earlier this week, National Infrastructure Commission chief economist James Richardson urged caution over the technology, claiming that the industry had a track-record of failing to deliver on emerging technology. 

Like what you’ve read? To receive New Civil Engineer’s daily and weekly newsletters click here

Readers' comments (1)

  • Not again......please dump this tech. Its the most repugnant form of energy generation ever invented. If you look at you requirement to behave ethically, how can you even begin to think about working on this. Is it ethical to produce waste that last 200,000 years? No. Should you ask thousands of generations to look after it at their expense? No.
    Drop this tech and clean up the mess earlier generations have created. That's all we should be doing.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs