Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

UK could have Hydrogen trains in 'three years'

Coradia ilint d

Hydrogen powered trains could be operating in the UK in as little as “three to four years”, according to Alstom.

The train manufacturer confirmed plans to bring the technology to the UK and announced that it was already working with Eversholt Rail ‎to convert Class 321 electric trains by fitting hydrogen tanks and fuel cells to “upcycle” the trains. The company is currently testing its first hydrogen train, the Coradia iLint, in Germany.

The move is in response to the UK government’s plans to remove diesel rolling stock by 2040. Nearly a third of all the UK’s trains are diesel trains, which will need to be replaced or refurbished to hit the government’s target of no diesel rail vehicles by 2040.

Alstom managing director UK & Ireland Nick Crossfield said: “We think the potential long-term application of hydrogen in the UK is very significant. Less than 50% of the UK network is electrified, and much that isn’t electrified is unlikely ever to be so. Starting with this conversion, we think hydrogen could offer the right zero carbon solution for many parts of the network.”

Trains powered by hydrogen fuel cells have both air quality and noise pollution benefits as they are near-silent and emit no particulates.

Fuel cells on the train produce electricity through a combination of hydrogen and oxygen to create water. Electrical energy is intermediately stored in batteries and the train is powered by an electrical traction drive. The only exhaust is steam and condensed water.

However, not everyone is completely convinced by the scalabilty of hydrogen trains. Despite welcoming the move and saying the introduction of hydrogen trains was a very positive one, Birmingham Centre for Railway Research and Education senior lecturer in electrical energy systems Stuart Hillmansen said they were “not currently the answer” to electrification.

He said the current fuel cell technology would be useful on tributary lines for trains which cover around 400km to 500km a day, many of which currently use diesel trains.

“Hydrogen can extend the reach of electrification,” said Hillmansen. “It’s not an alternative to electrification - running from Penzance to Aberdeen, say, is not currently achievable.

“Where hydrogen trains fit in is for those services which do 400km to 500km per day and there are quite a few trains which do that and you can refuel the hydrogen. Where it’s not going to be able to replace is for very long distance journeys where the train is doing about 1,000 miles a day. That would be a challenge in storing enough hydrogen storage capacity on the trains.

“It’s not competing with electrification, it’s in partnership with it.”

Hillmansen also said that while the trains themselves would produce no emissions, hydrogen was an energy carrier and still required energy to be produced. However, hydrogen could be produced using sustainable electricity and electrolysis or through industrial processes.

Like what you’ve read? To receive New Civil Engineer’s daily and weekly newsletters click here.


Readers' comments (1)

  • Philip Alexander

    Isn't it about time that sensible people questioned the "green-ness" of hydrogen as a fuel?
    The energy needed to manufacture the liquid hydrogen itself and the necessary safe storage systems both onboard and railside is far in excess of that needed to move the trains using conventional diesel or electric propulsion. How do these greenie politicians think that the hydrogen will be manufactured? Solar, windmills? No, it will use fossil fuels.
    The politicians and journalists seem to be prepared to swallow whatever tosh the greenies serve up without question. They are seduced by the notion that the only emission is water whilst completely ignoring the energy inputs and emissions used in production of liquid hydrogen.
    It's therefore about time that our learned Institution steps up and presents the facts so that the "whole of system" energy inputs can be properly considered and understood by everyone, including politicians, rather than just parroting the one-sided argument of the greenies, attractive as it sounds.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.