Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Transport Committee chair slams HS2 bill delay

3081902 hs2 train

The chair of the Transport Committee has slammed the government’s plan to delay the bill required to begin works on the second phase of High Speed 2 (HS2).

Lillian Greenwood said the decision to push the bill back a year “raises further doubts over the government’s commitment and willingness to invest in the Midlands and the North”, urging the government to be “transparent” in the reasons behind the delay.

The Department for Transport confirmed that it is pushing back the bill needed to begin work on the second section of the network between Manchester and Leeds to take account of Northern Powerhouse Rail linking Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield and Newcastle.

Following the news, it was announced that the man overseeing Phase Two of High Speed 2, Phase Two managing director Paul Griffiths, would quit the company at the end of the year to lead the programme management team on the £25bn Metrolink job in Toronto, Canada.

Greenwood said that transport secretary Chris Grayling must now explain the situation “as soon as possible.”

“If true, this is a poor start to the new parliamentary year for the Transport Secretary,” she said. “It’s yet another potential delay to a large and complex transport infrastructure project and raises further doubts over the Government’s commitment and willingness to invest in the Midlands and the North.

“Ultimately, this project was meant to be the ‘great economic conduit’ for the North and part of the plans to rebalance economic growth in this country.

“Without HS2 Phase 2b, the potential transformation to connectivity across the Midlands and to the great cities of the North and Scotland will be lost.”

She added: “Serious cost concerns are raised - Ministers must be upfront with us about where the finances of this project stand and provide reassurances that they won’t derail the full scope of this project.

“The Government needs to be more transparent about why this decision has been made. It’s a poor show that MPs and the public are finding out through a third-party.”

The bill enabling the works for Phase 2b between Manchester and Leeds will now be tabled in 2020. However, the government insists that this will have no bearing on the final completion date.

Like what you’ve read? To receive New Civil Engineer’s daily and weekly newsletters click here.

Tags

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.