Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Technical Paper: Validation of methods for assessing tunnelling-induced settlements on piles

Mike Devriendt, Arup Michael Williamson, University of Cambridge & Arup. This paper was first published in GE’s

Abstract

For tunnelling projects, settlements of structures supported on piles are often appraised by using simplistic empirical assumptions. These include assuming the greenfield tunnelling induced ground movement a given distance down the pile represents the displacement at the pile head.

This paper compares two commonly used empirical assumptions with an analytical method of analysis. The analytical method has the advantage that the mobilisation of shaft friction and axial loading down the pile can be calculated. Analysis using the analytical method takes very little time to carry out, is an improvement in sophistication relative to empirical methods and is less time consuming than carrying out more rigorous analysis using finite element or finite difference methods.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.