Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

National infrastructure bank calls stepped up ahead of pre-budget

Calls to protect investment in vital infrastructure and create a national infrastructure investment bank, were stepped up this week when the ICE delivered its pre-budget report submission to the Chancellor.

The submission, which includes new in-depth research on infrastructure funding in the UK, follows recent warnings from the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) and the British Chamber of Commerce (BCC) that cutting spending on roads, railways and power stations, to bring debt levels down, will delay economic recovery.

The ICE’s commissioned research provides a strong case for such a bank, to ensure vital infrastructure projects such as high speed rail and a new generation of power stations get the funding they need. This is especially important during a downturn when investment in infrastructure is cut back due to strain on the public purse and increased pressure to deliver value for money on infrastructure projects.

“It is vital that we find a way of ensuring that sufficient, long term funding is available to develop our transport, energy, water and waste management networks.”

ICE president Paul Jowitt

The concept of the bank has gained support from a range of figures across the political spectrum, including former EU transport commissioner Neil Kinnock, Liberal Democrat deputy leader and shadow chancellor Vince Cable MP, author/economist Will Hutton and right-leaning think tank Policy Exchange.

The research, carried out by Loughborough University, justifies the need for continued investment in infrastructure. It also explains the shortfalls in the current infrastructure fundingpractices and how the bank could offer a solution.

ICE president Paul Jowitt said: “It is vital that we find a way of ensuring that sufficient, long term funding is available to develop our transport, energy, water and waste management networks − on a continuous basis and at an acceptable cost to consumers.

“Such a bank could operate like the European Investment Bank (EIB), raising money from the international money markets, whilst being underwritten by the government. This would mean it could lend at lower rates of interest, holding down the cost of capital for borrowers. Like the EIB, a national infrastructure investment bank would provide much needed access to funds for infrastructure projects and lessen the pressure on public generated funds by actively facilitating private investment.

“This is not about the government spending money. It is about saving money in the long term, whilst ensuring a secure source of funding for crucial infrastructure projects that will aid the transition to a low carbon economy and strengthen UK competitiveness.

“As the CBI and BCC have also rightly acknowledged, a government determined to make a success of the future UK economy must protect investment in its critical infrastructure,” said Jowitt.

Readers' comments (1)

  • Primary System of a nation.
    Capital (Country) ----> Infrastructure (by Projects) ---> Increase Capital (Country).
    With increase in Risk systems, we now have: Added Brokers (they do not create anything)

    Capital---> Financial Systems --> Infrastructure ---> Financial System ---> Capital.

    Now that the Financial System is broken... They are eating all the money give from Capital to keep themselves safe or correct the old wrongs. Leaving Infrastructure Dry and not allowing Capital Growth.

    So, instead of making good existing Financial System, this is the right time to make a new Financial system (as cost is low because--> no wrongs to make right ) instead of helping old system which has a wrong system in-build and can potentially burst again.

    It is the right move to take.. by developing specific Infrastructure Banks.
    Xrail costs £16bn---> returns £20bn + (also many other technological benefits.. Output Constructive work) instead £425 to £500 bn easing (Repair work.. Output few big firms survive, non-constructive middlemen govern market demand-supply). I see this purely as Middlemen problem removing or developing newer middle system is beneficial)
    Do correct misconceptions!
    Thanking you
    Kind Regards

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.