Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Manchester Airport gate 'structurally secure'

manchester airport cropped

Engineers have ruled that a temporary gate at Manchester Airport  is ‘‘structurally secure’’, after it was evacuated earlier this week when cracks appeared.

A phased reopening of the gate, which was constructed as part the airport’s £1bn expansion with Laing O’Rourke as main contractor, will begin today, an airport spokesperson confirmed.

Passengers reported cracks in the wall and floor of the temporary structure on Tuesday before being evacuated. One traveller wrote on twitter that the temporary floors sounded “like they were collapsing”. 

Temporary structures specialist Losberger De Boer was sub-contracted to build the gate. The 37.6m by 35m structure was designed to be in operation for up to two years during the demolition of the existing terminal. 

Laing O’Rourke is responsible for the design and construction of the Terminal 2 extension, involving the terminal’s extension by 150%, reworking access roads to the terminal and building a new access ramp linking the M56 to the airport.

A full report on the cracks is expected to be finalised by Laing O’Rourke following the investigation. 

Like what you’ve read? To receive New Civil Engineer’s daily and weekly newsletters click here.

 

 

 

Tags

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.