Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Jean Venables: My brilliant year

What has Jean Venables made of her year as president of the ICE? And did her gender make a difference? She talks to Jackie Whitelaw.

Jean Venables was not really ready to talk about the end of her presidential year when we did this interview on 15 October. She still had almost three full weeks to go before she hands over the role of ICE president to Paul Jowitt on 3 November. And she is planning to continue enjoying every moment of her tenure until the last second.

“I am going to miss the role very much,” she says. “It has been a wonderful opportunity.”

The highlights of the year for her are too many to single out. Regular users of the ICE website will know Venables has been keeping a regular blog detailing what she has been up to, and reading it back, she has astonished herself.

“I started my year in Scotland and my last trip was to India. It has been strenuous but very varied. And it has been a huge privilege to see so many schemes and meet so many enthusiastic members.”

“It has been a huge privilege to see so many schemes and meet so many members.”

Jean Venables

She can pick out two achievements of which she is most proud. Venables has relished the opportunity to lead the business of the ICE − from chairing Council to balancing the budget.

“I am pleased that I have helped the institution adjust from the financial situation we were in to where we need to be,” she says. There have been significant adjustments to make − ICE commercial arm Thomas Telford’s (TTL) profits have been hit like everyone else’s in the financial crisis.

“This has led to a drop in TTL profits in recruitment, room hire and conferences. That drop had to be accommodated.”

Added to that, an initial plan to ask members to approve a 5% subscription rise was re-thought and a more recession-friendly 2.5% requested and approved.

“The new financial policy is now in place. It has not been without pain and a lot of people have worked very hard but we have made an important adjustment to suit our income and we are going to end up with a balanced budget,” Venables says.

Building links

A year spent building links with the government, especially the All Party Group on Infrastructure that the ICE administrates, is top of her list of external achievements, she says.

“We have been working with government in the widest sense − commenting on the Floods and Water Bill, the Pitt review on the 2007 floods and the Infrastructure Planning Commission (IPC).

“I am meeting the prime minister in November as part of a group discussing construction professionals.”

“What we really need to concentrate on is energy production − especially low carbon.”

Jean Venables

One of the challenges Venables will be handing on to Jowitt is to keep up the pressure on whoever wins next year’s election to have some long term strategic plan for infrastructure development.

“What we really need to concentrate on is energy production − especially low carbon energy production. If there are going to be more electric cars and more trains there will be a sharp rise in the energy requirement and this will only be of benefit if it is from a decarbonised electricity source.”

Venables is the ICE’s first woman president but it is hard to tell, she says, if her gender has made a difference.

“Everyone has been very supportive, all over the world. It has been a little like when I started on site and I got a lot of support.” Her husband Roger has been hugely important in terms of back up.

“I couldn’t have done it without him,” she says.

Readers' comments (1)

  • I have been very disappointed by Ms Venables reluctance to encourage a proper debate within the ICE on the whole question of Anthropogenic Global Warming. I raised the issue with her in my congratulatory letter on her appointment but to no avail. With the widespread doubts now emerging is it not incumbent on the ICE to stimulate this discussion. What if the warming is being caused by natural changes and the influence of CO2 emissions is far less than the uncalibrated models indicate. The engineering consequences arising out of the two scenarios are so different that we must have contingency plans for both. But then writing to ICE very rarely elicits a response which is very disappointing and unprofessional.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.