Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

ICE advises MPs to leave Parliament

Palace of westminster

A full decant of MPs from the Houses of Parliament would provide the best value way of refurbing the stricken building, a key engineering figure has told MPs.

David Hirst, chair of the management panel at the Institution of Civil Engineers, told the cross-party Palace of Westminster Committee that full access to the historic structure was important.

Five options for restoring the building from 2020 were set out in a report published last summer by a consortium comprising consultant Aecom, structures specialist HOK and financial giant Deloitte.

The report said that if the palace remained inhabited, a rolling programme of works would last 32 years and cost £5.7bn in 2014 figures.

Alternatively, it found that if MPs and peers moved out, extensive work to repair decaying stonework, drainage problems, roof damage, corrosion and ageing electrical systems could be delivered in six years for £3.5bn.

Hirst told the committee hearing today: “In terms of a pragmatic solution to getting the job done, a full decant has clear advantages.

“Giving clear access to a range of contractors over a period of time offers the simplest, best and lowest risk option.

“Partial decant would include quite a lot of working around existing activities. You would end up taking up a lot more space to allow existing activities to carry on. It would be quite difficult to co-ordinate and more expensive as a result.

“Continuing maintenance on a larger scale without decanting, we would never see the end of. It is beyond the working lifetime of the people involved and the scope of works would necessarily change during the lifetime of that scale of works.”


Readers' comments (2)

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.