Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Heavy fines for water pollution incident

NCE stock water

United Utilities Water Limited has been fined £600,000 and its contractor, KMI+ £333,000 after pleading guilty to polluting a brook.

Both companies were also ordered to pay a total of £45,262 in costs – United Utilities £19,090 and KMI+ £26,172 – following a prosecution by the Environment Agency. The fines were given at Bolton Crown Court on June 24, 2016.

The court heard how KMI+ was contracted by United Utilites to carry out improvement works at Wayoh water treatment works at Turton Bottoms. In December 2013, as part of the works, KMI + emptied and removed a tank which had been used to store sodium hypochlorite in 10% solution. Sodium hypochlorite is used in the water purification process and is also the principle ingredient of household bleach, therefore it is very corrosive and is highly toxic to fish.

The Honorary Recorder of Bolton, Judge Timothy Clayson, heard that by December 4, 2013 the majority of the contents of the tank had been removed but up to 300 litres of the highly toxic chemical was left in the bottom and needed to be emptied.

Counsel Richard Bradley, prosecuting on behalf of the Environment Agency, told the Court that instead of pumping or siphoning the remaining liquid out, a decision was taken to put a hosepipe into the tank and dilute the sodium hypochlorite with water, letting it overflow into a bunded area and leave the hosepipe running unattended overnight for 15 hours. This was carried out without any risk assessment or method statement and the companies were not in agreement on what they understood had been agreed prior to the removal taking place. Neither company had surveyed the drainage adequately and did not realise there were faults in the drainage system which meant the diluted toxic chemical entered the surface water drainage system and discharged to Bradshaw Brook, a trout spawning ground.

On December 6 2013, the Environment Agency was alerted by a member of the public who had found dead fish floating in the water. A 1.7km stretch of the brook leading towards Jumbles Reservoir was so badly polluted that virtually all aquatic organisms, including fish, shrimp and earthworms were killed. Up to 900 dead fish were recovered, including Brown Trout, Loaches and Bullheads, but the number killed is likely to be much greater. At the end of June 2014 the brook had recovered sufficiently for restocking to take place and United Utilities paid for the brook to be restocked with native fish from the downstream section.

Both United Utilities and KMI+ pleaded guilty at the first available opportunity and cooperated with the prosecution. The Honorary Recorder of Bolton, Judge Timothy Clayson said the incident had arisen through senior management failings to ensure proper system and procedures were in place.

A United Utilities spokesman said: “We fully accept the court’s decision in light of the regrettable environmental impact caused by this incident.

“We take our environmental responsibility very seriously and have since reviewed our process and procedures to minimise the risk of an incident like this happening in the future.”

Gordon Whitaker, Environment Manager of the Environment Agency, said: “This was a serious and avoidable pollution incident caused by the negligence of both parties. It took several months for Bradshaw Brook to return to a healthy state and even then it was necessary to assist this process by restocking fish in the affected stretch. This case should bring home the message to all company directors and shareholders that environmental offences are taken seriously both by the regulators and the courts.”

 

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.