Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Heathrow Southern Rail and DfT at loggerheads about track access

3115718 heathrow southern rail image 3to2

Plans for a southern access rail link into Heathrow are stalling because the Department for Transport (DfT) is unable to agree track access arrangements, New Civil Engineer can reveal.

The chief executive of Heathrow Southern Railway Ltd (HSR Ltd) told New Civil Engineer that revenue risk attached to using the existing network is a major stumbling block to the project being taken forward with the DfT saying the scheme had “fallen short” of its requirements.

The HSR Ltd proposal involves building 13km of new track to provide a southern access route into Heathrow Airport.

But the line will tie into the existing network so HSR Ltd needs assurances its trains would have access to the existing tracks as these are already used by other train operators.

HSR Ltd chief executive Graham Cross said the scheme is prepared to take on risks connected to construction, resourcing and reliability, but not take the risk of being unable to use the existing rail network. 

“On the risk allocation we’ve always been completely clear if you want to privately finance a piece of infrastructure you can do that on good value for money terms as long as you allocate risk sensibly,” said Cross.

Cross added that the guarantee it required from the government was not financial and that the scheme could be entirely funded by private backers.

“What we’re proposing is something which we know is realistic and financeable,” he said. “In theory we are asking the government to take usage risk, but that shouldn’t be a problem because they want a southern link to Heathrow.

“Surely if you want a link to Heathrow, you want trains to run over it.”

Cross said the project will find it difficult to raise further risk capital and could lose the backing of its investors if it fails to win government support.

To go forward Cross is now calling on the government to set out a timescale and process for which the ideas will be evaluated and taken forward.

“We are suggesting that what the DfT should be doing is launching an expressions of interest process perhaps in March and a proper competitive bidding process in June that would result in the identification of a preferred developer,” he said. “Then they could have the strength and status to go forward and raise further finance.”

In December last year the DfT rejected proposals for the Windsor Link Railway, an alternative Heathrow southern access rail proposal.

Like what you’ve read? To receive New Civil Engineer’s daily and weekly newsletters click here.

Tags

Readers' comments (2)

  • Michael Thorn

    The shambles of access to, and within, Heathrow airport is an indictment of the privatisation philosophy which has resulted in disparate organisations providing disparate transport services which fail to add up to a coherent system. This is exacerbated by a Government Department that either does not understand or does not care, and clearly has no strategic plan. For many years easy access to Heathrow from the West and North has been almost non-existent, apart from an execrable coach service from Reading station along frequently congested motorways. There appears to be fix of mind that cannot imagine that travellers might not want to start in Central London. Any agreement to expansion at Heathrow should be conditional on establishing coherent transport links to the rest of the country,

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 27 years ago a study of highway requirements in this quadrant of London (called HASQUAD) identified the need for both highway and rail access to Heathrow from the south and capacity problems on the rail routes feeding their proposed rail route.
    Their solution was for current Waterloo, Wimbledon, Kingston loop services to continue to Heathrow, complemented by an extra service running from Kingston to Twickenham and Waterloo. That reduced revenue risk effects on existing services.
    Their ideas need to be revisited, with tweaks to recognise that their short extra link from Kingston to Heathrow was controversial and a route to Heathrow via the Shepperton branch would be better.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs