Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Fresh evidence for Garden Bridge review

Garden Bridge

Evidence has been submitted to the mayor of London’s Garden Bridge project review by the Committee of Public Accounts (PAC) due to its concern over the use of taxpayers’ money.

The review – conducted by former PAC chair Dame Margaret Hodge MP – will examine the value for money of public investment for the project. £60M of public funds has been pledged for the £185M project.

Concerns over the use of taxpayers’ money prompted the PAC to collect evidence and question civil servants involved in the decision-making process.

The submission includes a timeline of the PAC’s involvement with the project and transcripts of evidence given by civil servants, as well as communication over a ministerial direction to increase the Department for Transport’s pre-construction commitment to the project.

“The story of the Garden Bridge is a sorry tale about how high profile individuals with the ear of the powerful mayor of London can gain access to funds with little risk,” said PAC chair Meg Hillier.

“At each stage it is taxpayers who have footed the bill. The London taxpayer has been doubly hit. In addition to central government putting in £30M, TfL [Transport for London] has also contributed £30M for a project that seems largely for the benefit of tourists.

“With an already stretched budget, TfL can ill afford this and there are still important questions about who would pay the ongoing maintenance of the bridge which the mayor’s review needs to get to the bottom of.”

Readers' comments (1)

  • Michael Thorn

    We can only hope that this Vanity of Vanities Project will be firmly buried by Margaret Hodge. To indulge in such fripperies when social infrastructure is under increasing financial pressures simply widens the chasm between Metropolitan affluence and Regional poverty. How about some garden Libraries and garden Health Centres and garden Music Schools instead?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.