Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Fire expert claims Grenfell cladding not fit for 'a bungalow'

grenfell tribute

A material used in Grenfell Tower’s cladding system known as polyethelene (PE) is so combustible it should not even be put on a bungalow, according to one fire expert looking to ban PE on buildings.

Speaking at the Tall Buildings Fire Safety Network conference in London, Institution of Fire Engineers fellow Merlyn Forrer said he would ban PE in cladding systems.

“I personally would ban PE on buildings,” said Forrer. “I would not even put it on a bungalow”.

Grenfell Tower had Reynobond 55 PE aluminium composite material (ACM) rainscreen cladding, which contributed to the rapid spread of fire across the 67m high tower’s external walls.

The rainscreen cladding used PE, a combustible plastic, between two sheets of aluminium. Manufacturer Arconic has admitted to the Grenfell Tower public inqury that its product “was not of limited combustibility for the purposes of the building regulations”.

Speaking at the same conference, insulation firm Kingspan head of fire engineering services Tony Ryan said it is “very obvious that polyethelene core ACM is a problematic material”. Kingspan insulation was used in some parts of the cladding at Grenfell Tower.

Fire Protection Association director Jim Glockling said the British Standard BS 8414 test, which is used to assess fire resistance of large-scale cladding systems, needs to be more realistic and better reflect real-life scenarios such as vents and openings interrupting firestopping in the cladding.

“Is it worth looking at in terms of improving the way we test things? Yes, almost certainly,” he said.

“At the end of the day we need to accurately replicate the option provision that can occur in practice.”

Currently the government is consulting on a new British Standard, BS 9414, which would be an extension of the current BS 8414 and would contain more detailed information.

Like what you’ve read? To receive New Civil Engineer’s daily and weekly newsletters click here.

Tags

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.