Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Exclusive | Ferry shuttle service to rival Rotherhithe crossing

3103878 rotherhithetocanarywharfcrossing3x2

Thames Clippers is set to table a rival bid to the proposed Rotherhithe crossing, New Civil Engineer can reveal.

It is understood that Thames Clippers will table its detailed proposal for a ferry shuttle service between Rotherhithe and Canary Wharf later this month.

Working with Beckett Rankine, the ferry scheme will be put before Transport for London (TfL) bosses before a second public consultation is held on Atkins’ bridge concept this autumn.

Estimated to cost a tenth of the £300M to £400M valuation of the bridge, the proposed service would involve a fleet of three ferries which can be boarded from either end.

Departing every two or three minutes in a “tube-style” service, each ferry can carry 150 passengers including 50 cyclists and 100 pedestrians.

At peak times the ferry service would be able to cater for 1,800 people per hour – the estimated maximum number of people who would use the crossing. At non-peak times the shuttle service would reduce to one or two ferries.

As part of the scheme, two berths will be built at Nelson Dock on the Rotherhithe side of the river, while one berth will be created in Canary Wharf with the option to build a second later down the line if demand increases.

While docked at the berths the electric-powered vessels will charge. Each journey expected to take two to three minutes.

Backers of the scheme claim that it is more cost-effective and less likely to be interrupted by passing ships than the bridge proposal.

Dispruption to the ferry service caused by passing ships is expected to be less than that caused by the bridge having to open and close.

If given the go-ahead, the ferry service is expected to take 18 months to two years to come into service.

Like what you’ve read? To receive New Civil Engineer’s daily and weekly newsletters click here.

Readers' comments (3)

  • A very different proposal. A bridge would be there for at least 60 years and be (presumably) free to cross. I assume the operator would charge for a ferry and would withdraw it it is was no longer commercially viable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The cost of operating the ferries is less than the cost of operating the bridge; whether either crossing is tolled or not is a political decision. The ferries have a 30-40 year life and they could be replaced many times with the money saved by not building the bridge.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There already is a ferry crossing from the Hilton hotel. Both the cost and access restrictions are prohibitive so very few people use is.

    How long are we going to have to wait for the Atkins proposal to be publicised? The image above is the design developed by reForm and Elliott Wood for their

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.