Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Exclusive | Alternative HS2 route tabled for the North

A new scheme which combines parts of High Speed 2 (HS2) and Northern Powerhouse Rail proposals has been tabled by engineering consultants Expedition Engineering. 

Led by former HS2 independent design panel member Alistair Lenczner, the proposal - dubbed HS2 North - uses existing rail infrastructure to better connect Leeds via Manchester with Birmingham, replacing the need to build large sections of HS2. 

Lenczer is now taking the proposal to the National Infrastructure Commission and the Department for Transport for consideration. 

Current plans for HS2 phase 2 start at Birmingham and branch into two Y-shaped lines, dubbed phase 2a and phase 2b. While phase 2a connects Birmigham with the North West and Crewe, phase 2b extends to Manchester Piccadilly and Leeds, and was originally allocated £24.8bn in the 2015 Spending Review.    

Under Expedition Engineering’s alternative plan, the eastern leg of phase 2b connecting Leeds and Birmingham would be scrapped. 

Instead, Manchester Piccadilly would be turned into a through station with the tracks extended in a tunnel towards Leeds (see route comparison below). The line also borrows from Northern Powerhouse Rail plans to connect Leeds and Manchester via Bradford.

 

3 comparison existing and proposed

An alternative route to Leeds and further north would also be provided by upgrading the existing line between Birmingham, Derby, Sheffield and Leeds to a high speed line.

A new station south of Bradford on the new high speed connection would serve towns such as Dewsbury and Halifax as well as Bradford. Sheffield, which would have been directly served by the eastern leg of phase 2b line, would not lose out, benefitting from the upgraded existing line. 

Final designs for phase 2b will be included in the hybrid bill. The bill was expected to be tabled in September 2018 but was delayed by a year and is expected to be put before parliament this Autumn. 

Speaking to New Civil Engineer Expedition Engineering director Alistair Lenczner said: “Before any final commitment is made on plans for new rail projects in northern England, the opportunity to build new infrastructure that can be used by both HS2 and regional TfN trains should be properly explored,” said Lenczner. “Appropriately designed shared infrastructure is likely to provide the best outcome in terms of value for tax-payers money.”

Lenczner said there were no technical barriers to the new proposals with Antwerp, Berlin, Vienna, Rome, Madirid and Brussels stations as examples where a terminal station had been remodelled into a through station to give greater connectivity.

“For the sake of future generations in northern England, it is vital that the right network diagram is adopted if we are to avoid reproducing the poor network connectivity and inefficiencies that the 19th century rail networks created,” he added. “Evidence from recent continental European rail projects shows that that any major new city centre station should be designed as a through station and that terminus stations are outmoded.”

Speaking at an All-Party Parliamentary Group on Infrastructure (APPGI) debate, National Infrastructure chair Sir John Armitt backed the idea of through stations saying that terminus stations were not practical anymore.

“If you look at European railways, they do not run into terminials they run through them,” said Armitt. “A T junction in Leeds beggers belief.”

Like what you’ve read? To receive New Civil Engineer’s daily and weekly newsletters click here. 

 

Readers' comments (5)

  • The Berlin comparison is a bit iffy. Berlin Zoo was a terminal only because of the Berlin Wall. The new Hauptbahnhof is just a more central station built on existing tracks. However, terminals are being slowly eliminated. Stuttgart is having a through high-speed station built beneath the old terminus.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So get on with the electrification north of Kettering NOW so that the area can gain some benefits before HS2N but reduce its timescale

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have some reservations about this, but think it has some merit.

    4 trains per hour between Euston, Old Oak, Manchester Airport, Piccadilly, Bradford & Leeds are needed. Two operating via Birmingham Interchange and spending 4/5 minutes loading/unloading at Piccadilly and Two 10 minutes later & slightly slower via Birmingham Curzon St (5 minutes to reverse) to depart evenly spaced at Piccadilly.

    The idea would be popular in Bradford & Derby and unpopular in Leeds.

    A new track and viaduct at Welwyn would be essential for Newcastle ECML services.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As a northeast resident I agree with the single simple cost saving HS spine from ECML AT York through Leeds Manchester and WCML at Crewe to Birmingham. Also avoiding termini is a no brainer, as the citizens of Florence are finding out.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This proposal appears to make sense.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.