Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Delivery doubts hover over four major infrastructure projects


The delivery of several major government projects including High Speed 2 (HS2) are “in doubt”, a report has concluded.

HS2, the Great Western route modernisation, the Lower Thames Crossing and East West Rail were all given amber delivery confidence ratings, meaning that completion of the project is in doubt unless “urgent action” is taken, said the Infrastructure & Projects Authority. 

Projects that were given a red rating, indicating that successful delivery of the project appears unachievable, include the Intercity Express Programme and the construction of an M20 lorry area. 

A red rating suggests that there are major issues which “at this stage do not appear to be manageable or resolvable”.

Consulting firm RSM partner Andy Murray said: “With Parliamentary and departmental time diverted toward managing the Brexit process, it is hoped that time is not being taken away from much-needed strategic infrastructure and projects.”

Thirty one projects in the government’s major projects portfolio fall within the infrastructure and construction category, with a combined whole life cost of £196bn.

The Department for Transport (DfT) has the second highest number of projects in the pipeline. The number of projects has remained “relatively stable” over the past year but whole life costs have increased by a third, says the report.

New Civil Engineer has contacted HS2, Network Rail, Highways England, the East West Rail consortium and DfT for comment. 

Like what you’ve read? To receive New Civil Engineer’s daily and weekly newsletters click here.



Readers' comments (1)

  • It would be useful if the origin & authenticity of this report could be explained. If it is an official report, a web link would be appreciated.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.