Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

‘Critical faults’ force Hammersmith Bridge closure

Hammersmith bridge

Hammersmith Bridge in West London has been forced to close indefinitely after ‘critical faults’ were discovered.

London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, which is responsible for the bridge, gave little details of the latest revelation except to say the faults were discovered during weekly inspections, triggering safety concerns and the bridge’s indefinite closure.

The beleaguered Grade II bridge has long been in need of strengthening, and has had severe speed and weight restrictions in place while a longer term major refurbishment plan was sought. Work was scheduled to begin on site late last year.

Political rows over funding appear to have contributed to the closure. In a statement, the council blamed government cuts.

“We have a fully tested plan to refurbish the bridge and we’re ready to start work,” Hammersmith & Fulham said. “But, due to government budget cuts, Transport for London (TfL) says it can no longer fund the planned refurbishment. This is a huge disappointment.

“Regrettably, we’ve now been left with no option but to close the bridge indefinitely until the refurbishment costs can be met. So we’re supporting TfL’s call for the government to invest in this vital river crossing and national monument – so we can get on with the work and reopen the bridge.

Consultant Mott MacDonald detailed its extensive testing work to New Civil Engineer over a year ago – this work was to inform the council in deciding on the full refurbishment plan.

Much of the structure is original, with the cross girders, the majority of the hangers and suspension chains all dating back to 1887. The foundations for the bridge were built for a previous bridge on the same site and date back to 1827. 

Like what you’ve read? To receive New Civil Engineer’s daily and weekly newsletters click here.



Readers' comments (2)

  • Philip Alexander

    Complaints about lack of Government funding by TfL are poppycock. If they hadn't been so epically incompetent on Crossrail by overspending by about £3 billion, they would have had plenty of money to spend on this precious historic asset. It's sheer hypocrisy to blame others for lack of funds. It's purely TfL's fault.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A not inconsiderable amount of money was spent on the fabled "Garden Bridge". Perhaps there should be more accountability in public office? Whilst it might not be as glamorous to refurbish something rather than build it, surely saving a significant historic structure has merits significantly greater than creating an almost-universally opposed, unnecessary carbuncle over the Thames?

    As an aside, there was a significant lack of critical thought applied in this magazine during the gestation period of said "Garden Bridge"....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.