Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Council calls for Lower Thames Crossing re-think

3133517 lower thames crossing cgi

Gravesham Borough Council has hit out at Highways England’s plans for the £6bn Lower Thames Crossing (LTC) in Kent, saying it was “strongly opposed” to a number of the proposals put forward in the public consultation for the scheme.

Although the council agreed that a crossing was needed, in its official response to the public consultation on the scheme, it raised a number of changes which it said were needed to improve the scheme and reduce its impact on the surrounding community. It also maintained that the crossing should be built at Dartford, rather than its currently proposed location, 10km to the east, at Gravesend.

“The western option south of the river was selected in 2017 because it had less environmental impact than the eastern,” the response said. “The current proposals are however very damaging indeed on the environment and affect more local residents (Riverview Park and Thong).

“A re-think is needed of these proposals.”

Gravesham Borough Council covers the southern part of the route from the connection with the A2 and north to the Thames. It did not comment on the northern part of the route from Tilbury to the connection with the M25 at North Ockendon.

Lower Thames Crossing map

Lower Thames Crossing map

Source: Highways England

Given the proposed route be taken forward, the council said it welcomed the extension of the tunnel underneath the Thames and the deletion of the A226 junction, but said it “strongly” opposed the current proposed A2 junction with 70mph slip roads.

This, it claimed, damaged the landscape, historic features, and nature conservation, particularly it said, in the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. It also said noise, air quality and construction in the short term, remained major concerns.

The council said further design work, environmental assessment and consultation were necessary on the Thong Lane Bridge north and the tunnel portal to mitigate the impacts of the scheme on local residents. It proposed an extension of the tunnel southwards, widening of the bridge and mitigation for local residents for noise and air quality.

It added that the information about the construction compounds was unclear and raised concerns about the implications for local residents and the environment over the “long timescale” for construction.

A Highways England spokesperson said: “The Lower Thames Crossing consultation is arguably the most significant that has ever been held into a UK road scheme and we have had an excellent response from stakeholders and communities across Kent, Essex and London.

“We have had significant levels of positive and constructive engagement with Gravesham Council. We will be considering its feedback and recommendations, which will play an important role in the evolution of the design. We look forward to working closely with Gravesham Council as we continue to develop our proposals to maximise the benefits and reduce the impact locally, regionally and nationally.”

The public consultation on the proposed scheme opened in October last year and closed on 20 December. Speaking at New Civil Engineer’s Tunnelling Festival last month, Highways England LTC project director Tim Jones said the number and size of the civil engineering challenges to be overcome will be substantial.



Readers' comments (1)

  • Any re-think of the Lower Thames Crossing ought to consider the introduction of a railway within the crossing. This would encourage a modal shift from road to rail which is a more sustainable form of transport. A Lower Thames ail crossing could also allow freight trains from Essex and East Anglia to have easy access to the Channel Tunnel.

    The Fehmanbelt crossing currently being built between Germany and Denmark has both road and rail within the new tunnel and sets a good precedent for the sort of joined-up infrastructure planning that ought to happen more within the UK.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.