Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Collapsed Italy bridge was undergoing strengthening works

Policia italybridge

The collapsed Italian motorway bridge which killed at least 22 people was undergoing foundation strengthening works at the time it collapsed.

Italian highways operator Autostrade has confirmed that it had been carrying out maintenance work on the flyover bridge when what is understood to be a 250m length and pier collapsed.

The operator said it had been strengthening the structure’s foundations as part of scheduled maintenance works, although it is not yet clear where foundation work was taking place.

“The works and state of the viaduct were under constant monitoring and supervision,” the company said in a statement. “The causes of the collapse will be thoroughly investigated as soon it is be safe to access the site.”

Deputy transport secretary Edoardo Rixi confirmed that at least 22 people have died in the collapse, with a further eight people taken to hospital with various injuries.

The bridge has been subject to numerous maintenance projects since the last 1980s, most recently in 2016.

Inaugurated in 1967, the bridge – nicknamed the Brooklyn Bridge by locals – has undergone several renovations since the 1980s, including a project to add new steel cables to strengthen the structure in the 1990s.

The way in which the tower collapsed has left engineers “shocked”.

Independent bridge consultant Simon Bourne said: “What shocked me is that the whole tower has gone. It’s not just a piece of the deck which has gone which normally happens, it’s the whole deck. That’s very unusual.

“What on earth could cause the whole tower to come down? The entirety of one side must have gone.

“The tower, which is generally designed to be in balance structure, but with one side gone, that would then cause the whole tower to rotate and fall over quite quickly.

“It could have been a lightning bolt, it seems pretty unlikely, but there’s a potential it could have hit the top anchor point and had a massive impact on it.”

He added: “One trait of the early bridges is that they had a single batch of big cable stays. Today’s cable stayed bridges have a whole fan array of cable stays which are easier to construct, gives more robustness in case one fails and are easier to replace if needs be.”

The 11 span, pre-stressed concrete, cable stayed bridge is similar to two other bridges in Venezuela and Libya also designed by Riccardo Morandi.

First designed in 1957, construction of the Genoa bridge was carried out between 1963 and 1966. 

Like what you’ve read? To receive New Civil Engineer’s daily and weekly newsletters click here.

Readers' comments (2)

  • Now realise it's cable staxed. I thought originally the cables looked like solid concrete but it's more complex than that

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It seems too coincidental that heavy rains and lightning at the time.
    Other bridges in Italy have collapsed under heavy rains also.
    my hunch at this early stage is a lightning strike through water laden prestressed concrete 'cables', almost bursting the element.
    I had previously speculated on foundation/scour failure but see now the bridge piers are heavily piled and the base of the piers still stands.
    How are these bridges made lightning proof ? time will tell and sure that NCE will get to the cause quickly

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.