Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Civils firms urge tidal lagoon go-ahead

Tidal Lagoon Power Swansea Bay lagoon wall

The Swansea Bay tidal lagoon pathfinder project could be “one of the nation’s biggest industrial opportunities in a generation” according to a letter from civil engineering and manufacturing bosses published in the Financial Times.

More than 20 UK-based manufacturers and civils firms – including Laing O’Rourke and Welsh firm Alun Griffiths – have called for the £1.3bn project to go ahead, urging the government to put its confidence in an industry which could give the UK a global competitive advantage in tidal power.

The letter was published ahead of the Hendry Review , whose conclusions were made public on Thursday. Last May former energy minister Charles Hendry was tasked with investigating the cost effectiveness of tidal lagoons in a government review.

“Tidal lagoons can quickly become a pillar of the UK energy mix. Energy generation that is predictable, never-ending, zero carbon and, crucially, that is made in the UK,” states the letter.

“We have at our fingertips a brand new sector that will create a multibillion pound industry, provide tens of thousands of jobs across the country and create a significant local supply chain. All of this before we even think about the massive potential as a British export technology,” it adds.

The letter claims that if approved, Swansea Bay and subsequent tidal projects could provide power for up to a third of UK houses for the next five generations, and catalyse a new British engineering and construction industry which could export its skills around the world.

“If the UK really wants to be a world leader in manufacturing and trade once more, we need to make a sector our own — both domestically and internationally,” adds the letter.

“We must have the confidence to embrace our first-mover advantage in a new global tidal lagoon industry.”

Digital industrial company General Electrics’ (GE) UK division – which is manufacturing components for part of the lagoon – signed the letter because of the opportunities a new tidal industry could bring to the UK.

“We believe this is about seizing the first-mover advantage in a new global industry valued in the tens of billions, capable of scaling to sustain tens of thousands of UK jobs, with a potential export market for British-made turbines (using British-made steel), generators, grid equipment and engineering expertise,” said GE UK chief executive and president Mark Elborne.

“Tidal power, with the Swansea project as its pathfinder, gives the UK that opportunity. We signed the letter because we feel that if the UK government is bold, sees beyond the short-term perspective and grasps this opportunity now, by 2030 it could once again be a case of Britannia ruling the waves.”

Swansea Bay partner Atkins also looked forward to the outcome of the Hendry Review, stressing that tidal lagoon technology could give the UK a global edge.

”A positive decision on the lagoon at Swansea Bay will prove the concept and provide the confidence to develop a fleet of lagoons domestically as well as open up opportunities for the UK supply chain in overseas markets,” said Atkins’ infrastructure division managing director Mike McNicholas.

Swansea Bay is a pathfinder project planned by Tidal Lagoon Power, which has five more full-scale projects in the pipeline. Tidal lagoons are thought to have a 120-year lifespan, double the lifespan of a nuclear plant.

 

Readers' comments (1)

  • It is interesting to consider that the UK firms cited are calling for go ahead, compared to other article where the hyperloop company is just going ahead.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.