Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Analysis | What next for Hinkley Point C?

Hinkley c pre construction works may 2015

There’s an old Chinese proverb that goes: “When is the best time to plant a tree? A hundred years ago. When is the second-best time to plant a tree? Yesterday.”

For the China General Nuclear Corporation (CGN), which signed an agreement to take 33.5% stake in Hinkley Point C last October, whatever the initial timeframe for the nuclear power station, the Somerset mega-scheme is worth investing in.

So as nerves in the UK and France are increasingly jangled with each expected final investment decision delay, is now the time to look east for wisdom and focus on the big picture?

In 2007, EdF said that its Hinkley Point C new nuclear project would be up and running by 2017. Fast forward almost a decade and civils firms are still waiting for the official go-ahead.

Since the beginning of the year there has been the departure of two significant figures at EdF: Hinkley Point C project director Chris Bakken returned to the US to pursue new opportunities and has been clear that his departure wasn’t due to lack of confidence in the project; And this week it was reported that chief financial officer Thomas Piquemal resigned because of concerns the Hinkley project could jeopardise the energy giant’s finances, although this has not been confirmed by the company or Piquemal.

In the aftermath of Piquemal’s departure, EdF’s share price took a hit. In addition, a union at the heart of EdF is questioning the project and saying more time is needed before a decision. And many would like to see similar EdF projects in France and Finland up and running before any final commitment to Hinkley, but these too have been problematic and are delayed. For example, the project at Flamanville in France needs to finish testing on the Flamanville 3 European Pressurised Reactor reactor pressure vessel (RPV) closure head and bottom head.

Against the backdrop of what’s going on at EdF, the issue is also very politicised. Only last week Labour said the Government needs a “plan b” for Hinkley. Even celebrities are pitching in with Carol Vorderman Tweeting “isn’t it time to stop this debacle” in reference to the departure of Piquemal.

But as much as we can discuss and speculate, we simply won’t know whether EdF will go ahead with the final investment until it tells us. And what the company has been telling us all along is that it is committed to Hinkley Point C. Only on Monday, chairman Jean-Bernard Levy released a statement reiterating this: “With the support of its shareholder, the state, EdF can confirm that it is looking to invest in two reactors at Hinkley Point under the best possible financial conditions for the group, with the objective of making a final investment decision in the near future.”

It’s obvious that, so far, Hinkley Point C hasn’t gone to plan. If it had, construction would be well in hand. Since 2007, the timescale and the economics have changed dramatically. But what hasn’t changed is the UK’s need for energy, as well as the commitment of EdF, CGN and both the UK and French governments to Hinkley.

When prime minister David Cameron and French president François Hollande met in Amiens earlier this month at the 34th Franco-British summit, documents from the meeting said of Hinkley: “This major strategic project is a pillar of the bilateral relationship and will be a key aspect of Britain’s energy policy, offering the guarantee of safe, competitive, decarbonised energy by 2025.”

So while the day-to-day rollercoaster of news stories on Hinkley provides plenty of fodder for debate about if and when the project should go ahead, is it time to steady our nerves, take inspiration from the Chinese proverb, and simply say that any time soon will be the second best time to build Hinkley Point C?

Readers' comments (1)

  • The (lack of) news on the start for Hinckley Point is most disturbing but who is actually to blame? The model for the energy industry has clearly not worked since the CEGB and the local boards were broken up. Competition has been the watchword but has this actually added to costs rather than reduce them? Each time you switch you automatically add £40 to your bill. This is the cost that the switching sites charge the suppliers for advising you to move and this has to be met from bills. This reduces the 'profit' which could otherwise be ploughed back in to new generating capacity.
    So who should we blame when the lights go out - why Martin Lewis of course.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.