Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Amey halts Sheffield trees work after assault allegations

sheffield streets ahead cropped

Amey has paused its Sheffield tree felling work due to safety concerns after contractors and protestors clashed. 

The £2.2bn Streets Ahead PFI deal between Sheffield City Council and Amey has been the centre of controversy after environment campaigners claimed healthy trees were being felled. Last summer the council was granted a High Court injunction banning protestors from entering a tree “safety zone”.

Clashes between protestors and Amey workers in Meersbrook Park Road to the south of the city centre escalated last week until the work was called off on Monday.

Streets Ahead account director Darren Butt said: “We welcome safe and peaceful protest but unfortunately this is not what we experienced in Meersbrook Park Road on Monday. In the interests of everyone’s safety we withdrew from site, and we will resume as soon as we can ensure the safety of our staff, local people and the protestors themselves.

“Re-planting certain street trees which are ailing or damaging is one of the ways we deliver the council’s legal duty to maintain the city’s highways, which is why a High Court injunction is in place to keep our working areas safe.

“We urge people to respect peaceful communities and not to wilfully obstruct our works on the highway by staying outside the safety zones, so we can complete this programme for the benefit of everyone in Sheffield.”

sheffield streets ahead cropped

sheffield streets ahead cropped

A South Yorkshire Police spokesperson confirmed on Twitter that it had received “a number of allegations of assault in relation to this matter”, adding that police are reviewing the reports. New Civil Engineer has contacted the police for further comment. 

Under the PFI deal, trees are classified as either dangerous, dead, diseased, dying, damaging footpaths or properties, or “discriminatory” - for example by obstructing wheelchair users - before a decision to fell them is made. Sheffield Council lists 25 possible engineering solutions for problem trees, alongside felling, but only 14 of these can be carried out within the contract. 

Sheffield City Council told New Civil Engineer that “huge budget cuts” meant that “careful consideration” had to be given before exploring the other 11 options, and documents presented by the council to the High Court said there was “no money for unfunded solutions outside of the PFI contract framework”.

Readers' comments (1)

  • Michael Thorn

    This long-running saga is a text-book example of how not to commission and run a PFI contract in the public sector. The Council appears to think that having devolved responsibility to a contractor, it is released from any obligation to engage with the community that elects it, and that it can hide behind the terms of the contract when challenged. The Contractor has no social obligations: its underlying objective is to perform the contract and make a profit. I don't imagine that the Amey employees working on the contract enjoy the site confrontations any more than the residents. Anodyne statements about "the benefit of everyone in Sheffield" just add fuel to the arguments. Senior people from all sides need to be seen on site and engaged in making serious efforts to come to a rational solution.
    "Reading the contract" is never a route to satisfactory mediation.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.