Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

£9bn US flood barrier ruled a wash out

Bston

Plans for a £9bn flood barrier in Boston, USA, have been slammed by the University of Massachusetts.

The university’s report said the cost of the works would outweigh the benefits and that the barrier itself would take 30 years to install.

Instead the report concluded that the city would be better investing in much cheaper shore-based resilience measures.

“Harbor barrier systems have been a helpful tool for certain other coastal cities, but in this case, Boston would be making a bet on a massive infrastructure project with limited benefits compared to the alternative,” academic director of Sustainable Solution Lab Paul Kirshen said.

“The more impactful strategy the city can pursue is to stay focused on neighbourhood, shore-based resilience, moving quickly and working closely with communities.

“Local protections can also provide additional public realm advantages that maximize investment and benefit everyone plus provide us the flexibility to adjust to the uncertainties of climate change.”

The report also suggested that the proposed barrier would also face “major technical challenges” which could increase its time scale and price.

In particular the report raised issue with the proposed mechanism suggested for opening and closing the flood defence system.

Like what you’ve read? To receive New Civil Engineer’s daily and weekly newsletters click here.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.