Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Lane Cove: rock bolts replaced steel supports

News

A DECISION to replace steel support girders with rock bolts could have contributed to the Lane Cove motorway tunnel collapse in Sydney, health and safety investigators said last week.

The report by WorkCover New South Wales, Australia's equivalent of the Health & Safety Executive, reveals that the tunnel was originally to have been supported by steel girders.

It says that design and build contractor Thiess John Holland (TJH) asked designer Parsons Brinckerhoff to replace these with rock bolts.

'The ground support option of steel sets or girders for poor ground conditions in shale, was superseded? and replaced with a less conservative rock bolt and shotcrete support option, ' says the report.

The Lane Cove collapse occurred on 2 November 2005 at the junction of the Pacific Highway exit ramp tunnel and the Marden Street ventilation tunnel in north Sydney (NCE 10 Nov 2005).

he tunnel was being built using the New Austrian Tunnelling Method with road headers excavating the tunnel while rock bolts and shotcrete are used to stabilise and strengthen the walls and roof.

Parsons Brinckerhoff had originally specifi ed steel girders to permanently support the 9m diameter excavation where ground conditions were particularly poor, before two passes of shotcrete were sprayed 17mm and 200mm thick.

The latest report follows TJH's own investigation in January which revealed that the rock bolts were too short (NCE 26 January).

However the new report states that not only were the bolts a metre shorter than they should have been at only 4m but that the applied shotcrete was not always thick enough. The report says that the contractor failed to make the tunnel wide enough and then applied a thinner layer of shotcrete to preserve the design cross section.

INFOPLUS To access the report go to www. nceplus. co. uk

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.