Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Keeping up appearances


I read with interest the letters in recent issues (NCE 27 April) debating whether the ICE or RIBA should organise bridge design competitions and, whilst I understand both arguments, I would request that either organisation appoint a bridge engineer to the judging panel to specifically judge the suitability of the bridge for maintenance and inspection.

I am a principal engineer responsible for a mixture of public and private bridge stock which includes special and landmark structures. By definition bridges are difficult to access and the need to undertake works is vital for long term asset management, as is the correct choice of materials for whole life costing at the outset of the project.

These elements are not always fully appreciated by designers but should play a critical role in selecting a bridge which will reflect the owners' need for an important and long lasting asset.

S. Monaghan (M), Mandeville, Main Road, St. Pauls Cray, Kent, BR5 3HE

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.