Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Judgement day

LETTERS

The enthusiasm of the police in catching motorists exceeding the speed limits on our roads should not be seen as any great improvement in road safety.

Engineers use skill, experience and factual evidence to produce a reasonable balance between risk and cost. Arbitrary speed limits do no such thing.

Whether or not the risk to anyone from vehicles travelling just above the specified limit is greater or less than movement at the limit depends on other factors which the present obsession of 'catching' the motorist entirely ignores.

Under many conditions of light, weather, road design, weight of traffic and the like, travelling at the legal speed limit may be far more dangerous than the risks imposed under totally different conditions at speeds somewhat above limits.

When the driver decides that there is, in risk terms, no direct relationship between his speed and unreasonable risk, prosecution by the police will only induce a sense of alienation. The police should always be able to show some 'reason' for imposing punishment in a particular case - not just an easy chance to increase police funds.

J D McCaughey, 4 Tarawoods, Farmhill Road, Holywood, Co Down, BT18 0HS

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.