Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Japan should not stop UK nuclear

Fears that an earthquake could cause a nuclear accident should not lead to the scaling back of Britain’s nuclear power programme, chief nuclear inspector Mike Weightman said last week.

Questions still remain over impact

But questions remain about the full impact on the nuclear power industry of the recent disaster at Japan’s earthquake-hit Fukushima nuclear power plant.

Weightman was speaking as he published his report Japanese Earthquake and Tsunami: Implications for the UK Nuclear Industry.

The full report is not due until September, leaving questions about the implications for the nuclear new build and decommissioning programme.

The report states that the direct causes of the Fukushima nuclear accident − a magnitude 9 earthquake and associated 14m high tsunami − are far beyond the most extreme events the UK could expect to experience.

Immediate UK safety improvements ‘unecessary’

In this respect the report concludes that there is no reason for curtailing the operation of nuclear power plants or other nuclear facilities in the UK. The report adds that immediate safety improvements to operating nuclear reactors in the UK are unnecessary.

Past ICE President Mark Whitby, now director of consultant Davies Maguire & Whitby, welcomed the report but said there were still safety concerns. “Overall my concern is that we have hugely complicated systems that rely on man management which at its best is brilliant but has a tendency towards complacency,” he said.

A key area exposed by the Fukushima disaster was the lack of water storage on site.

“If they do not act [upon my recommendations] then I can take very robust actions. Industry takes responsibility for its operation but we have an iron fist inside a velvet glove.”

Chief nuclear inspector Mike Weightman

Workers at the plant had to spray huge amounts of water into the overheating reactor to cool it. While successful, it produced huge amounts of contaminated water with no place for safe storage.

“[Lack of water storage has] clearly crossed our minds, but we need to know more about what happened,” said Weightman.

All but one of the UK’s existing nuclear plants rely on gas cooling. However, the new generation of plants are to be cooled by water.

Site layout could be the area most affected by any recommendations from the full report. Location of back-up power generators and high volumes of nuclear fuel close to the reactor made the situation at Fukushima worse.

Weightman added the nuclear industry must take a lead on his recommendations but played down any prospect of them not being implemented.

“If they do not act [upon my recommendations] then I can take very robust actions. Industry takes responsibility for its operation but we [the Office of Nuclear Regulation] have an iron fist inside a velvet glove.”

Weightman is leading the International Atomic Energy Association on a fact finding mission to Japan next month.

Readers' comments (1)

  • If Germany is planning to take all it's nuclear plants off line shouldn't we respect the fact that they may know a great deal more about the possible dangers (having been closer to Chernobyl) and take another long hard look before we commit ourselves to a new generation of nuclear power stations in Britain. I wonder what result a referendum would give?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.