Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

It's time for us to bite the road user charging bullet

When it comes to government policy on roads, my constant disappointment is that no one has ever grasped the national user charging nettle. Sadly our current administration looks unlikely to break this mould.

Of course I understand that it’s a sensitive area for politicians. When broached in the past it has prompted furious outcries, rapid political back tracking and diving for cover.

I also understand that a nationally implemented charging system would be a very complex undertaking, fraught with technical challenges, risks and potential costs.

But we must overcome these fears and challenges. Biting the bullet of road user charging is the only sensible way to tackle both road congestion and the pitiful funding going into our roads.

For all the vital investment to help public transport provide a realistic alternative to car travel, our love affair with the independence the car gives us continues.

Even our new transport secretary Phillip Hammond admits to enjoying the occasional run out in his beloved Jaguar.

And while his Cabinet colleagues have vowed to walk between meetings wherever possible, the ministerial (hybrid) car is set to stay, if only to carry the red boxes.

Yet roads look set to occupy the front line of the government’s offensive against unnecessary public spending. They remain an easy target when looking for public services to cut. We have seen a major slice of the managed motorway programme lopped as part of the Chancellor’s first £6bn of cuts.

“Roads look set to occupy the front line of the government’s offensive against unnecessary public spending.”

The likelihood is that locally, possibly nationally, more cuts in road construction and maintenance budgets will follow.

However, as can be read in NCE’s roads special features this week, the roads industry is already embracing the challenges presented by the new world of public spending austerity and is delivering “more for less” at both local and national level.

We are seeing innovative procurement, innovative delivery, innovative maintenance and innovative products cutting the cost of infrastructure and reducing congestion.

But existing budgets, particularly in local authority road expenditure, are already way below the amount needed to maintain a decent network. And congestion is only set to increase.

National road user charging is the radical solution required. Certainly, it is about revenue raising, so would have to dovetail with changes to the road fund licence and fuel tax. But it is also about tackling congestion through incentives for not using certain roads at key times whenever possible. Right now is a pretty good time for both the public and the politicians to embrace this previously difficult reality.

First, the technology works, second, the revenue will be hugely welcome and third, this government can sell pretty much any radical idea with the “need to cut the deficit” card.

Besides, given the overall pain that the nation is about to suffer across the board, it is unlikely that this issue will be top of anyone’s list of complaints.

Readers' comments (2)


    What part of the existing road user charges does Anthony Oliver not understand? All the existing road network - with the exception of the M6 Toll Road - have already been paid for by charging the road user through annual fixed car taxes and variable fuel taxes based on the more you drive the more you pay. Already these taxes raise many times more than the cost of providing and maintaining our road system. All politicians realise it would be political suicide to introduce user charges for existing roads; apart from the big brother approach which is necessary to collect these charges giving the authorities details of where it's citizens are at any time, etc, etc.

    Congestion charges for [limited] city centre zones, where there are adequate public transport alternatives and local residents are exempt, may be desirable.

    Charge for new toll roads? Absolutely. The citizen has a choice. If you don't want to pay, you don't have to use them. What a pleasure it is to drive on the M6 toll, without trucks and congestion.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • (1) Drivers pay enough already (2) the intrusion/mistake prone, an electronic means the only feasible one Suitable for a place the size of Singapore, not UK. (3) Cost of the system, and collection of tolls. (4) M6 toll is exceptional, unique - many drivers still do not use it because of cost, and there is an alternative - that's why you get your nice drive! (5) Unlike (e.g.) less crowded France, we have no alternative road network as there is to their paid up toll system: in many case a Motorway is the only by pass to a town or city. (6) Many roads built when road building was out of fashion, e.g. 1990's, already substandard with bits never properly joined up, don't insult us with a further charge for doing what should have been an essential priority, before may others (Olympic squander!)

    BUT (7) Why are drivers not more intelligent to avoid rush hour/max congestion, it only takes a few less in many cases. More Employers to allow flexible hours and so on.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.