Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Is the ICE giving value for money?

Letters

The move to increase fees for retired Members raises the question of the fairness of ICE fees in general. Civil engineers are generally paid less than other engineering professions and yet we pay the highest institution membership fees.

The ICE - or the Engineering Council - should carry out an annual benchmarking exercise against other engineering institutions on fees and other key issues. Members can then compare and decide for themselves whether or not they are receiving 'value for money'.

At a time when the Institution of Highways and Transportation has applied to the Engineering Council for nominated body status (allowing its members to pursue chartered status), the ICE should be careful not to alienate its Members.

Paul Donnachie (M), 7 Lowther Road, Norwich NR4 6QN

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.