Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Inverness tunnel gets go-ahead despite fears

Controversial plans for an £85M road tunnel under the Caledonian Canal in the Highlands city of Inverness were pushed through by local councillors last week.

The councillors voted in favour of the tunnel link, despite a recommendation against it by council officials. This advise was backed by a technical report from consultant Scott Wilson Scotland, which showed a bridge crossing would be a less risky and cheaper option.

"This (tunnelled) option presents significant construction risks," said report author and head of transport at Highland Council Sam McNaughton.

"Much of the work takes place below the level of the river and the canal, and the general ground water table, and significant temporary works will need to be put in place to keep the deep excavations free of ground and flood water during the construction phase."
However, Scottish National and Liberal Democrat councillors teamed up to back the tunnel after an online poll of local people showed there was 90% support for the tunnel. Councillors voted 41 to 21 to approve it.

The tunnel would pass 15m under the canal with 900m of approach roads “substantially below ground level” and protected by 15m-high walls to prevent flooding.

The canal would be closed for nine months while the tunnel is bored, but officials warned that there was a major risk to the proposed 30-month construction timetable between 2012 and 2015.

The council will now apply to the Scottish parliament for funding for the project – part of a southern bypass of the city known as the Inverness Trunk Link Road to cut road congestion in the city.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.