Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Indecent proposal

Letters

The Edinburgh Airport Rail Link (EARL) proposal referred to by Lloyd Roberts (NCE 9 June) offers nothing that would improve the current unsatisfactory roads situation in the Edinburgh area, and cannot be considered a solution to problems brought about by inadequate roads.

Like the majority of its users, I travel to and from Edinburgh airport from a location within 30 miles of the airport.

For this journey, the most suitable mode of transport is the car and I believe that local roads should be such as would allow use of the car.

For the majority of air passengers, EARL would prove to be slower, less convenient and more expensive. And a car would still be needed to get one to and from the rail station. It is roads we need, better roads.

Tom Burke, mining consultant, tomburke@ mctb. fsnet. co. uk

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.