Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

In on the Act

Letters

According to a leading construction solicitor, ignorance of the legal wording of the Health & Safety at Work Act is leaving consultants vulnerable to criminal conviction for accidents on jobs they are designing (NCE last week).

In my opinion it is more likely to be ignorance of the designer's responsibilities that is the root problem. If the designer has carried out the design risk assessment process required by the CDM Regulations properly then it should be fairly straightforward to prove all 'reasonably practicable' steps have been taken to protect workers from foreseeable risk.

At present these are all too often seen as nothing more than a paper exercise in covering one's back once the design has been completed.

Greg Riddle, 17 Ashley Hall Gardens, Linlithgow, EH49 7DN

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.