Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

IMechE urges push to geo-engineer for climate change

The Institite of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE) has published a 100-year study to geo-engineer the planet, using artificial trees and algae blooms to reduce CO2 levels in the atmosphere and create 1M jobs.

The Migration, Adaption and Geo-Engineering (MAG) approach outlined by the IMechE comes from a year of work and is the first analysis of practical measures to deal with rising CO2 levels.

Head of IMechE Environment and Climate Change, Dr Tim Fox, is lead author: “Our report is exciting, innovative and novel. For the first time we really examine some of practical initiatives we could adopt to essentially clean up the mess we have made.

“After decades of failed mitigation, geo-engineering may give us those extra few years to transition to a low carbon world and prevent any one of the future climate change scenarios we all fear.

“This report has been produced with input from our young engineers and we hope it inspires fellow young engineers and scientists to work in the MAG sector and shape the future of our planet. After all, our future is the next generation,” he said.

Technologies that could be used include:

Mechanical Trees

Artificial or mechanical ‘trees’, powered by wind turbines, which would sequester CO2 from the environment in a similar way to natural trees, but several thousand times as effective. Trees would cost around £15,000 per unit and remove some 10 tonnes of CO2 a day. 100,000 would be sufficient to capture the UK’s transport pollution. ‘Mechanical forests’ could be planted along motorways or offshore

Energy from Algae

Photo bioreactors (PBRs), which contain algae, could absorb CO2 and produce a rich biofuel. Algae could live in both saline or waste water, keeping the system separate from drinking supplies. The fuel is believed to be between 18.5MJ/kg and 35MJkg - comperable to coal at 24MJ/kg.

PBRs could be incorporated into any building and waste could be used as fertiliser.

Reflective Buildings

Reflective materials on buildings would reduce the ‘heat island’ effect, where towns and cities are warmer than the surrounding area. Los Angeles is 4 degrees hotter than its suburbs, for example.

This heat accelerates smog formation and encourages the use of air conditioning.Reflective roofing could reduce cooling energy use by up to 60% but issues of glare and aesthetics would need to be considered.              

The five recommendations are:

  • Government sets-up a £10M-£20M fund to investigate geo-engineering approaches
  • Use green research facility The Tyndall Centre to co-ordinate and deliver a multi-disciplined programme to research geo-engineering techniques.
  • Promising geo-engineering approaches be piloted.
  • A realistic roadmap for decarbonisation of the global economy should be developed integrating geo-engineering.
  • The UK should lead the commercial development of geo-engineering techniques, stimulting private investment

Related files

Readers' comments (1)

  • Thanks for this, as heard more brfly on general media, excellent if not just for what it says but "to encourage the others" in active biosphere improvement/reclamation. There is plenty of energy out there to recover CO2 until we get a better energy source, the biggest problem is what to do with the product. Turn it back into carbon and burn it again? (Pumping the gas underground is short lived and risky)

    And it's the INSTITUTION of Mechanical Engineers, as we Civils should all know.

    Here's another, how to stop the vast underground coal and peat USELESSLY burning & polluting in India and Indonesia?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.