Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Image conscious

Letters

Your Comment (NCE 30 March) on bus rapid transit and the letters from Tony Young and Lewis Lesley (NCE last week) make many valid points. A mainly segregated tram system has a better image than most deregulated bus services, even if the bus has a few segregated sections and is backed by a variety of quality contracts.

However, the physical complexity, planning constraints and huge cost of providing segregated tram systems throughout the UK, severely restricts the number that can be provided. We simply cannot put back the clock - in the middle of the 20th century, the UK abandoned its tram systems, many with segregation and priority, in favour of the bus.

Furthermore, bus services can attract passengers if they are frequent, reliable and easy to use, with competitive pricing and good information. This can be seen in London and in a few other cities, such as Brighton, Oxford and York, where bus use is rising. The bus may be difficult to see as a thoroughbred, but it can be a very useful workhorse.

Nigel King (M), High Hedges, Cadmore End, High Wycombe, Bucks, HP14 3PL

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.